Q1. There was good variety of speakers: 79% (38 votes / 48 responses)
Q2. The introductory session dealing with history, diagnosis and microbiology was useful: 73% (38 / 52)
Q3. Presentations and discussion on PSD classification were useful: 80% (40 / 50)
Q4. Presentations of international guidelines helped me to understand my own practice: Yes 56% (29 / 52) or Somewhat 31% (16 / 52)
Q7. The most useful presentations were: Gips technique, modified Lord-Millar, Bascom Lift, Limberg flap, Karydakis Flap.
Q9 and Q10.The free comments were very informative and will help with planning of the next meeting:
- 1.5 or 2 days
- keep the short format (7 - 9 minutes per speaker)
- fewer speakers
- longer breaks to allow discussion
- more central and formal location in Europe
- presence of a microbiologist, anatomist
- ideas about prevention
Wednesday, 01 November 2017
